Supreme Court To Announce Verdict On Punjab CM Election At 7:30PM
The actual issue, according to CJP Bandial, was who could direct party lawmakers. The parliamentary party will direct MPs, according to the constitution, he said.
"In this instance, more justification is not necessary. The earliest feasible resolution of this issue will be our top priority, he declared.
In the meantime, the top court requested advice on a situation involving directives from a parliamentary party or the party leader.
Barrister Ali Zafar, the attorney for Elahi, was warned by CJP Bandial to assist the court with the legal matters or else they will remove themselves from the bench.
Zafar stated during his presentation of the case that the petitions opposing the 21st Amendment were fully dismissed by a 13:4 ratio.
The hearing against the deputy speaker of the Punjab Assembly's decision on the CM election went on for three days. The hearing was resumed here today by a three-member SC bench presided over by the CJP.
Irfan Qadir, the attorney representing the Punjab Assembly deputy speaker, and Farooq H. Naek, the attorney for the PPP, both came before the court at today's session. The PPP and Mazari's attorneys informed the court of their client's decision to boycott.
The demand for the establishment of the full court, according to CJP Justice Bandial, is a delay tactic, and the full court won't be accessible until the second week of September.
He urged the parties who were abstaining from the court proceedings to behave politely.
No comments:
Post a Comment